Why i almost didn’t believe in the collaborative process

photo-1473772564351-202a22a93101

Why I Almost Didn’t Believe in the Collaborative Process

My own divorce was a Collaborative Divorce, meaning we agreed to stay out of court. That was the pitch at the time: family law in BC was changing, lawyers were newly required to tell clients about alternative dispute resolution, and everyone we talked to called Collaborative the new, better way to do this. New and better were persuasive enough that my husband and I decided to try it.

I hated it.

Divorce is stressful enough on its own, and reaching an agreement with someone you’re in conflict with is hard regardless of the process. But I hated the Collaborative Approach even more than I expected to hate the alternative, an all-out fight.

I’d spent my whole life avoiding conflict, the way a lot of people do. I also believed I was reasonable, someone who could handle almost anything calmly. What that meant was that I let things go, over and over, except I didn’t let them go. I buried them until I couldn’t anymore, and then I exploded. That was exactly where I was standing when I had to sit down and negotiate my own divorce.

The Collaborative Approach is the opposite of the war most of us picture when we think “divorce”: courtrooms, revenge, a clear winner and a clear loser. At our first four-way meeting, with lawyers on both sides in the room with us, I nearly had a coronary. The pace felt glacial. The content felt like kindergarten, here’s why sharing matters, while I sat there thinking about how much two lawyers’ hourly rates were costing us to learn about manners.

I already knew what I wanted the outcome to be, so I sat through eight months of this until we got there. The agreement we landed on was close enough to what I’d wanted that I walked away thinking, well, that worked.

What I didn’t realize until much later was that I’d never actually understood what “Collaborative” meant, even after the whole process was supposedly done.

Looking back now, I know the professionals explained it clearly, at the start, throughout, and at the end. Something in me just wasn’t able to hear it. I’d spent forty years learning one way to handle conflict: avoid it until it became unavoidable, then fight to win. So instead of recognizing that we’d resolved things through an actually different method, I quietly filed the whole experience under my old framework. I avoided the separation as long as I could, then found a solution and forced it through, because underneath it all, I believed I was driving the process. I made the meetings happen. I made sure my ex did his part. I made sure the agreement got signed.

You can’t really learn a new way to handle conflict when you’re at the most emotional point of your life. I wasn’t calm or rational. I swung between sad and angry by the minute, sharing a house with someone I no longer wanted anything to do with, worried sick about my two young kids. I wasn’t in any state to absorb something new.

So while we technically used the Collaborative Approach, it only worked on the surface. We stayed out of court during the divorce. Afterward, once we were released from that structured process, we ended up in court anyway, still in conflict, having reverted fully to our old patterns the moment no one was holding the space for us anymore.

That’s true for a lot of people. Some people come into the Collaborative Process already wired for it, and it clicks immediately. The rest of us, trained our whole lives to do conflict differently, need more. We need to be told, repeatedly, what it actually means and how it works, because it’s a genuinely hard concept to absorb in the middle of emotional upheaval, against forty years of the opposite training.

I only really understood what Collaborative meant about a year after my divorce was finalized, once I’d started training to become a Collaborative professional myself.

Since then, working with people going through their own Collaborative Divorces, I’ve heard the exact words I once said: the meetings feel slow, nothing seems to be getting addressed, the process isn’t moving. Those words are a signal I’ve learned to sit up for. I have to remind myself how long it took me to understand this, and remember that the best thing I can do isn’t swoop in and solve their problem for them; it’s help them reach the same understanding I eventually found so that they can move forward on their own terms.

The Importance and Contradiction of Alone Time

A photo by Joshua Earle. unsplash.com/photos/ZMcLVBi9xx4

The Importance and Contradiction of Alone Time

School’s back, and so is the annual pressure to sign my kids up for everything. I’ve bought in, fully. My older son is resisting hard, and I need to let him win this one, right after I sign him up for swimming, choir, and cross country. Just for the bus ride after school to the park near us, obviously.

Dance is where I’m really stuck.

I put him in dance a couple of years ago because team sports never clicked for him, and because at the beach, a place he claims to hate, he’d break into dance completely unprompted. I decided that meant dance was his happy place. He did well. I loved the year-end concerts. His teacher told me he was a natural.

Now he tells me it’s boring. Same moves, over and over, one more obligation to please people, including me, including the woman who runs the studio. I still want to sign him back up anyway, because if he doesn’t keep at it, how will he ever know what he actually loves? He’ll fall behind. He’ll lose the thing that lit him up at the beach.

That’s the argument running in my head, the one currently badgering my kid into a dance class he’s already told me he hates.

This weekend gave me a clearer look at what’s actually going on.

My hiking trip got rained out. No kids; they were with their dad, no plans, an entire Saturday stretching out empty in front of me. I texted a friend to see if she still wanted to hike in the downpour. No. So I sat on my couch and felt the whole day loom.

I ran to my closet, put on my gear, and drove myself straight to the Grouse Grind. Came home, worked for a while, and when that wore off, I started beating myself up for having no life outside of work and exercise, so I started texting everyone I know. A friend offered to have me over to cook with her.

I hate cooking, always have, despite coming from a family of genuine foodies. When she asked, I realized what I actually wanted was to stay home, alone. She heard that in my voice, laughed, and told me to make a to-do list instead, something to distract myself from the “I’m alone” thoughts.

So I made the list. I’m a very dutiful friend, and as I started writing things down, I felt a small flicker of panic that the list was eating into my alone time. Which was absurd the moment I noticed it. I’d been upset about having alone time in the first place, wanting to fill it, and the second I actually started filling it, I missed the alone time instead.

I went to yoga instead. Then that same friend, the one who years ago introduced herself by randomly offering pizza to strangers walking past her house, invited me over for exactly that: bacon and potato pizza. I said yes. I came home that night, still alone, and it was fine. Completely fine. I went to bed happy and woke up happy.

Which brought me back to my son and his dance class.

Filling up every hour of a kid’s schedule teaches them that being alone, or bored, is a problem to be solved rather than a state worth sitting in. My son is an introvert, and he’s also a rule-follower, which means he does the thing he’s told even when he’s already said he doesn’t want to. I’ve been telling him he’s wrong to want out of dance, while insisting, in the same breath, that all I want for him is his own happiness. Those two things don’t actually fit together.

He needs time that isn’t scheduled toward anything, the same kind of time I finally gave myself this weekend, if he’s ever going to find out on his own what actually lights him up. Not because someone signed him up for it. Because he found it, the way he found the beach dancing nobody asked him to do.

How do You Know When to Pull the Plug on Your Marriage?

photo-1473773386757-42bbe7288351

The Two Fears That Almost Kept Me Married

When do you decide to give up on a marriage, actually call it quits, and ask for a divorce?

I ask because I honestly don’t know the answer. I never made that decision myself; my ex made it for both of us. Left to my own devices, I probably would have stayed until death do us part. I have a high tolerance for pain, and I’ve always preferred trying to fix things over walking away from them. I still want an answer, even though I’m slowly learning there isn’t a clean one, which is basically why I’m writing this at all. When do you actually call it quits?

Put another way: what’s actually stopping you from initiating a divorce, if part of you wants to?

From what I’ve seen, mostly fear. Two fears in particular tend to do the heaviest lifting: money and the kids.

Let’s take them head-on.

Fear One: You’ll Be Much Worse Off Financially

Being poor was one of my fears too. Combined, my husband and I could live comfortably in an expensive city on one income. Divorced, that math falls apart. I’d need a job, we’d need childcare, we’d need to split assets and fund two households instead of one. Both our standards of living would drop. That was a genuinely depressing thought, enough on its own to keep divorce off the table. I’d rather be unhappy and financially stable than happy and broke, or so I believed at the time.

My divorce happened anyway, and yes, my net worth dropped. My cash flow took a real hit. That brought real anxiety with it. I used to build monthly budgets just to confirm, yet again, that there wasn’t enough coming in to cover what was going out, which only fed the anxiety further, until I finally made the connection that stressing myself into a spiral wasn’t actually accomplishing anything.

Eventually I realized I’d always managed, one way or another. I cut my spending, found ways to bring in more money, made decisions, and kept moving forward in a direction that matched what I wanted for my life. For some people that means earning more. For others, it means spending less. Either way, there’s usually a path through.

Three years out, I can say plainly: being happier on my own is worth far more than what the divorce cost me financially.

Fear Two: The Kids Will Suffer

I’d been the primary caregiver for our two kids, four and six at the time we separated. I genuinely couldn’t picture their dad managing them alone for half their lives. Surely they’d go unfed, unbathed, put to bed late, and laundry would pile up forever. And beyond the logistics: my kids wouldn’t be with me for half their lives. They were four and six. They needed their mother. I needed them. They were, in a lot of ways, my whole purpose.

To be clear, my kids wanted us to stay together. My youngest once cooked up a plan where I’d rent an apartment in the same building as his dad, so we could live down the hall from each other. Adjusting to only having one parent around at a time was hard on them at first. But they adjusted. Honestly, it wasn’t even that different from before; my ex and I had barely occupied the same room together for the two years leading up to our separation anyway. They still have to manage two different sets of house rules, switching gears twice a week, but that’s just life. We all have to manage shifting expectations across different parts of our lives, jobs, family, everything. Kids of divorce just get more practice at it earlier than most.

It was harder on us, the parents, I think. I missed my kids desperately for a full three years after the divorce; I have the blog posts to prove it. It took my mom asking me this past summer, while the kids were away for their two-week stretch with their dad, “Do you miss your kids?” for me to actually notice something had shifted. I said, “No, I don’t miss them,” and then really sat with what I’d just said. The old version of me would have felt like a traitor for saying that out loud, wondering what kind of mother doesn’t miss her kids. Instead, I recognized it for what it actually was: a real milestone, for me, for their dad, and for them.

It took three years to build a life that could actually make me happy while my kids were away, and three years to genuinely trust they’d be fine with their dad. What I’ve come to believe, in that time, is that kids do better with two parents who are both actually capable of caring for them. Yes, it takes more coordination, and the back-and-forth between households is tiring, sometimes a little painful. But now they have two parents who can feed them, get them to school, sign them up for activities, and arrange their own plans. Two parents genuinely involved in their lives. I probably still do more, if I’m honest, but their dad is doing far more than he ever did while we were together. If we’d stayed married, I’d likely still be doing everything, and he’d likely still be on the sidelines. Now I have my own life, and a life as a mom, both. Time for my own things, my own work, my own growth, alongside real trust that my kids are being cared for by someone who loves them. That’s a genuinely good outcome.

It took three years to get here, though. Three years to understand that their dad does love them, and that doing things differently than I would isn’t the same as doing them worse. It’s just different. How do you even judge what good parenting looks like? The best I’ve landed on: a good parent is someone who loves their kids and is genuinely trying to do right by them.

Three years out, the fears that kept me in my marriage turned out to be mostly unfounded. I’m grateful my ex worked through his own version of those same fears and finally ended things. The marriage had run its course. We were done. We’re better for being divorced.

The Blame Game

Blame and Happiness

I went to a great workshop a few weeks ago put on by Dr. Sue Goldswain and John Boland. If you’re ever in the market for a marriage counsellor, they’re worth looking into.

One thing that stuck with me: it takes two people to build a relationship, and two people to take one down. If a marriage ends in divorce, both people played some part in that.

It was a relief to hear it wasn’t entirely on me.

It got me thinking, though. I hear a lot of different versions of how a marriage failed or is failing, and I’ve noticed something consistent: the person doing more of the blaming tends to be the one hurting more.

I know this because I lived it. I hated my ex when we first separated, and I was miserable. How could I have married someone so horrible? As the blame slowly faded, it actually turned into something closer to gratitude, and I got noticeably happier along the way.

How do you feel about your own relationship right now? If you’re doing a lot of blaming, is it actually fixing anything?

hire yourself

photo-1427464407917-c817c9a0a6f6

Hire Yourself

Tax season always brought the same question to mind: why is it still this stressful for so many people, when the software gets easier and cheaper every year?

I’ve seen the full range. Some people have everything to me the day filing opens, organized enough that I could practically just hit enter. Others I’d chase for years before finally filing a decade’s worth of returns in one sitting. In between, every shade of relief and dread you’d expect.

To be clear, I’m not talking about genuinely complicated returns; sometimes hiring a specialist is exactly the right call, so you can focus on what you’re actually good at. I mean the more ordinary case: employees, or people running a simple sole proprietorship, who still can’t bring themselves to sit down and do it.

Most of what stops people comes down to fear, in one form or another. Fear of making a mistake and facing penalties. Fear of having made too much money and owing a lot. Or, on the flip side, fear of discovering they made very little, and reading that as some kind of verdict on themselves rather than just a number. Easier to not look at all.

Then there’s the sheer volume of it. If you run your own business without a system for tracking money in and money out, facing a full year of receipts can feel enormous. I understood that fear well; some of my clients handed me a literal shoebox of receipts every year. Not my favourite kind of work, but it always helped to know I’d get paid for it.

All of that fear adds up to people avoiding a significant part of their financial lives. I’ve always believed that more information puts you in a better position to make good decisions, and burying your head in the sand tends to keep people stuck rather than protect them.

So what actually helps?

If it’s genuinely overwhelming, hiring someone is a reasonable option. Find someone you’re comfortable talking to, and ask them to walk you through what they’re doing as they go. It costs a bit more upfront, but it usually pays off, both in savings and in finally understanding your own numbers well enough to lose the fear around them.

I’m a firm believer in outsourcing what you genuinely can’t or don’t want to do yourself. That’s not a failure; it’s knowing your limits. But there’s a difference between outsourcing the task and outsourcing your understanding of your own financial situation. The first is fine. The second leaves you exactly as afraid of your own numbers as you were before, just with someone else quietly managing that fear for you instead of you managing it yourself.

My favourite suggestion, though: hire yourself. Decide what your own time is worth, sit down, and do the work. Once it’s done and you know what you’re owed, take that money and spend it on something that actually makes you happy. If saving it is what makes you happy, save it. But there’s a good case for putting at least some of it toward an experience you’ll actually remember.

Do that once, and next year’s taxes start looking less like a chore and more like an appointment with a bit of found money at the end of it.